🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – going beyond the winner overall, and block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and has become a kind of well-known figure this year for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

I had to do that because they were adding approximately 200K votes into the system frequently! I was actually a little nervous initially: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but there were two big batches of ballots added later and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible where yesterday went kind of poorly for him, where the opponent was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. However Mamdani added half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did Mamdani gain those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: multiracial, young, renters and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president last year went for Zohran now. However it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I figured we might exceed two million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to surpass half. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still probably 200K ballots left to report at that time. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he does because then none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly surprised me. The independent kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added many Republicans on the island who had a strong turnout. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it before the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

I think existed some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the property owners and homeowners all went for Cuomo. So there existed a little resistance. However no, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election there was coverage on whether the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

There are areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential there. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from the left hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be additional examples – people will come from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that each urban center in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in America – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.